Macro syntax

I am new here and this may have been covered. If so, I apologize.

I would like for comment macro syntax to be more in line with the rest if the system syntax. For example:

If I want to "GO" multiple, non-sequential virtual lists, it seems like the syntax should be GL 41 + 47 as opposed to GL 41 , 47. That comma is just not intuitive and requires fumbling about on a qwerty keyboard for a command that should be almost instantaneous.

Likewise, if I want to automate a fader, it seems to me that the syntax should be FM 10 / 0 TIME 6 as opposed to FM 10 / 0 t 6. Again, my fingers and brain know where the time key is located, but I have to stop and look for the T key and, frankly remember that T is the command that automated a fader over time.
Parents
  • IMO, Scott is right.

    Especially use of t is very unintuitive. When I used timing first time I was also wondering why we can't use TIME key.
    The idea of Hog has been always to have a low amount of keys and they are for what is printed on the key. Copy copies whatever you want, Delete deletes... Thats why it is important that Time is used in this case too.
Reply
  • IMO, Scott is right.

    Especially use of t is very unintuitive. When I used timing first time I was also wondering why we can't use TIME key.
    The idea of Hog has been always to have a low amount of keys and they are for what is printed on the key. Copy copies whatever you want, Delete deletes... Thats why it is important that Time is used in this case too.
Children
No Data