XP Vs. Vista and Mac OS

There are many lighting designer/programmers that are not interested in going to the new Vista OS. It is obvious that before too long just as Hog II is no longer supported or updated further, XP OS will soon find the same fate leaving us to yet again suffer with another unstable microsoft OS.
Mac OS has proven to be the most stable and less problematic of any OS software out there.

Do you have any reason not to make the Hog OS work with Mac OS without having to run XP on a Mac?
I think it would be worth looking at. Many are going to the new Mac computers as the OS is reliable and more efficient.
Parents
  • A little off topic but to concur with Marty:

    In my own tests I have found Catalyst runs with much greater performance on Tiger, ie more layers of playback. With my system I get 10-11 layers of photo jpeg. On leopard I can get nowhere near this many.

    Carbon Copy Cloner www.bombich.com/software/ccc.html is a great way to downgrade your new leopard machines. Its shareware also so is inexpensive.

    Ross
Reply
  • A little off topic but to concur with Marty:

    In my own tests I have found Catalyst runs with much greater performance on Tiger, ie more layers of playback. With my system I get 10-11 layers of photo jpeg. On leopard I can get nowhere near this many.

    Carbon Copy Cloner www.bombich.com/software/ccc.html is a great way to downgrade your new leopard machines. Its shareware also so is inexpensive.

    Ross
Children
No Data
Related