Labels in Patch

I know there's been some stuff about this before but I'm just wondering why, when I unpatch in address format, the associated channels lose their labels, and vice versa? It's annoying on a touring move. What is the reasoning behind this please?

Thanks,

Jane

Parents
  • We should chat about this in person, but for the sake of anyone else reading this. I think the logic makes sense. I'm sure all this is arguable, but...

    If I'm in Channel Format and I remove an address I'm saying what is attached to this address is no longer the output for this channel, so the channel label is preserved as this is the item I'm concerned with.

    If I'm in Address Format and I remove a channel I'm saying this channel is no longer the control point for this address, i.e. the label still applies to the address but not the channel.

    Dan

  • I'm with Jane on this one.

    At each new move of a tour the quickest way to remove the patch for the last venues dimmers is to be in address format. The fact that this removes the labels for the channels is really annoying because labeling the channels is really useful.

    You could set up a group in channel format to remove any address but there's a good chance you've added extra channels in some venues for workers etc etc. Clearing out the house universe is the safest way to go.

    One of my tours was complaining about this last week.

    Nick

Reply
  • I'm with Jane on this one.

    At each new move of a tour the quickest way to remove the patch for the last venues dimmers is to be in address format. The fact that this removes the labels for the channels is really annoying because labeling the channels is really useful.

    You could set up a group in channel format to remove any address but there's a good chance you've added extra channels in some venues for workers etc etc. Clearing out the house universe is the safest way to go.

    One of my tours was complaining about this last week.

    Nick

Children
Related