abbytutorow
Posted: Thursday, July 31, 2014 9:17 PM
Joined: 7/4/2014
Posts: 47
Apologies if these are known issues...
1) Tried to create a range of new submasters to put content in later. Range was not created properly. (Crappy) Screen shot attached. Eos Ti. Release code. I should have tried thru thru, but I didn't. Either way, it should not have created some previously non existent subs in this range and not the others. None of those in the range existed prior to the execution of this command.
2) Tried to re-label a channel part. Here's what I THINK I did... I can't remember exactly: Had a part already labeled. Hit label/ note to label. Hit label/note again to wipe the current text. Renamed. Hit enter. (Crappy) Screen shot attached. Also tried using backspace key instead of label/note. The text entry field above the virtual keyboard was showing correctly, but when I'd enter it, I got the [no name] appended to the end. PC client. Eos Ti was the master. I didn't try to fix it on the Ti itself until much later and after a power cycle, I think. Release code.
File Attachment(s):
IMG_20140731_193107155.jpg(2562832 bytes)
IMG_20140728_155904003.jpg (2561405 bytes)
/IMG_20140731_193107155.jpg){kind=link}
/IMG_20140728_155904003.jpg){kind=link}
ueliriegg
Posted: Friday, August 1, 2014 12:59 AM
Joined: 7/5/2014
Posts: 903
re 1): could it be that subs 298, 299 and 300 already existed? that would explain it. you typed Sub 285 Thru 300 which basically selects all existing subs withing the range (and creates the first one of the range if it didn't exist yet). you would want to use Sub 285 Thru Thru 300 to tell the console that you want to create the whole range instead of selecting existing objects inside the range
abbytutorow
Posted: Friday, August 1, 2014 11:34 AM
Joined: 7/4/2014
Posts: 47
The subs definitely did not exist before.
Additionally, today, I just tried to delete a range of subs, and *every* sub I had in the list, including ones that were not in the range I chose to delte, were deleted. I replicated that three times earlier (by undo-ing and re-trying the same command). Of course, now, that I try it again, I'm not able to replicate.