Avoiding unwanted NIP moves

Normal 0 false false false EN-US X-NONE X-NONE MicrosoftInternetExplorer4

We just went through our first production using and ION, and we were generally quite pleased with the console.

However, we still have to figure out the most elegant way to deal with moving lights in cues. We had about 120 conventional fixtures, 6 with scrollers, plus 4 VL-1000s and 3 Studio Colours.  Patching, palettes, cueing, and moving effects were all quite easy and straightforward.

However, both the designer and myself are used to lighting software (AVAB Safari in my case) that automatically discards attribute changes (NIPs in ETC-speak) that are not saved with an intensity level.  In other words, when setting a cue one can bring up a moving light, move it into a position, play with colours and gobos – and then decide not to use the ML in that cue, returning the intensity level to zero.  In such a case, the NIPS are not recorded with the cue – unless one deliberately decides to record them.  The same thing happens if one tries out the scrollers in a cue and then discards them.  This avoids a lot of unwanted noise from the rig.

We discovered that the ION records all NIP moves – even when the fixture is ultimately not on for the cue.  We wound up with a lot of ‘blind noise’ and spent a long time in spreadsheet mode cleaning out these unwanted moves, gobo and colour changes in dark fixtures.

How do folks usually deal with this?  From perusing the manual, it looks like selecting the movers and scrollers and issuing a SNEAK before recording each cue would deal with this.  Any other advice would be welcome.

I should mention that the basic cues were laid in with Tracking on, but many intervening cues were recorded later in Cue Only mode.  We do a lot of plays in which the script is developed in the rehearsal process, so there is a lot of tweaking during the production period.

Your advice will be welcome.  Thank you.

Paul Court

Humber College, Toronto

Parents
  • Paul,

    I definitely can relate to the "blind noise" issue that arises when programming, especially when you are in a hurry...which is practically all the time. A typical practice I try to maintain while programming is to mentally (and visually by looking on the screen) keep tabs on what my fixtures are doing, even when they are not on. If I spend a lot of time working on a moving light focus and eventually not use it, I always press [Sneak] [Enter] to bring those units back to their original state. Sometimes this can get you caught up with previous errors, so it also doesnt hurt to send everything [Home] [Enter] at the end of big cueing sequences and then build again from there. For instance, at the end of a big musical number, I try and send everything home in the restore cue, then re-assign whatever palettes I am using for the coming cue.

    As far as "Cue Only" vs. "Track", I tend to work in "Cue Only", but use [Update] [Track] a lot. Helps to clear out unwanted moves, but keeps the designer able to work in the "Cue Only" mindset.

    I realize this is not ground breaking information, but unfortuantely I think it comes down to the programmer :/ I tend to come in at least once before final dress and sit in the quiet theatre for a few hours and listen to every cue to avoid such issues. Especially depending on the space, unwanted moving light noise won't bring smiles from anyone. Spreadsheet is a great clean-up tool though :)

    -Nick

Reply
  • Paul,

    I definitely can relate to the "blind noise" issue that arises when programming, especially when you are in a hurry...which is practically all the time. A typical practice I try to maintain while programming is to mentally (and visually by looking on the screen) keep tabs on what my fixtures are doing, even when they are not on. If I spend a lot of time working on a moving light focus and eventually not use it, I always press [Sneak] [Enter] to bring those units back to their original state. Sometimes this can get you caught up with previous errors, so it also doesnt hurt to send everything [Home] [Enter] at the end of big cueing sequences and then build again from there. For instance, at the end of a big musical number, I try and send everything home in the restore cue, then re-assign whatever palettes I am using for the coming cue.

    As far as "Cue Only" vs. "Track", I tend to work in "Cue Only", but use [Update] [Track] a lot. Helps to clear out unwanted moves, but keeps the designer able to work in the "Cue Only" mindset.

    I realize this is not ground breaking information, but unfortuantely I think it comes down to the programmer :/ I tend to come in at least once before final dress and sit in the quiet theatre for a few hours and listen to every cue to avoid such issues. Especially depending on the space, unwanted moving light noise won't bring smiles from anyone. Spreadsheet is a great clean-up tool though :)

    -Nick

Children
No Data
Related