Morning. Not at the moment. At the beginning of the .pdf is a list of all used channels. Because a channel stored at zero (which is a used channel) is considered differently than a channel with a "null" ... or no value at all. Can I ask why you end up with channels stored at zero that never move higher than zero?
I was looking for unused channels this morning, and found two probable sources of channels stored at 0 that never move higher than 0. The first were some clearly dyslexic channels, e.g. 89 is a channel in the show, 98 is unpatched but has a 0 value in a cue. I believe that the channel was brought up, either via designer or programmer error, and we put it [out] instead of [undo] or [at] [enter]. The hard 0 got recorded in the cue.
The other were channels that were part of a group but not used. When I took the group out, which included some inactive channels, the inactive channels got recorded as hard zeros.
I couldn't find a way to query these (though querying Cue first thru enter showed the obviously errant channels). Going through and cleaning up all the partial blocks got rid of the zero-only channels.
I was looking for unused channels this morning, and found two probable sources of channels stored at 0 that never move higher than 0. The first were some clearly dyslexic channels, e.g. 89 is a channel in the show, 98 is unpatched but has a 0 value in a cue. I believe that the channel was brought up, either via designer or programmer error, and we put it [out] instead of [undo] or [at] [enter]. The hard 0 got recorded in the cue.
The other were channels that were part of a group but not used. When I took the group out, which included some inactive channels, the inactive channels got recorded as hard zeros.
I couldn't find a way to query these (though querying Cue first thru enter showed the obviously errant channels). Going through and cleaning up all the partial blocks got rid of the zero-only channels.
