Bug 3.2.5: Wrong offset behaviour when faning sneak

Question

Dear ETC-People,

I was happy to fan sneak timing but unfortunately it didn´t work as expected when I was using offset with it.
My Syntax was:
1_thru_10_@_100_sneak_time_0_thru_10 and I expected it to fade Channels 1+10 together and 2+9 and 3+8 and so on (as those are the shown subgroups in that case) but it was going 1 then 10 then 2 then 9 then 3 then 8 and so on.

I would say that´s a bug. Am I right or am I doing something wrong?

Cheers
Paul.e

eos moderator · Answer

After some experiments I think I can probably see what you're trying to report: the fanned Sneak doesn't respect subgroups. To be more precise it respects changed order in subgroups but doesn't trigger the fades simultaneously for all channels in the subgroups.

eos moderator · Answer

That's what had caused the confusion in my first reply. But I had figured it out in my experiments. Thank you for adding the correct syntax to this post.