Ion Macro Execute on Complete

the only thing i can think of is to add an additional cue after each cue you have now. those additional cues (let's call them point cues) would get a Hang 0 and an Execute Macro 1. but unless you use tracking, this could be a bit of a hassle.

you could:
Cue List Display
Cue 1 Thru CopyTo Cue 10/1.1 Enter (now you have as many point cues as original ones)
Cue 10/1.1 Thru Hang 0 Enter Cue 10/1.1 Thru Execute Macro 1 Enter (all point cues with hang and macro)
Blind Tracksheet
Cue 1.1 Thru Enter Chan 1 Thru 5000 At Enter (all point cues empty)
Cue List Display
Cue 10/1.1 Thru MoveTo Cue 1/1.1 Enter (you merged your point cues into your original ones)
Delete Cue 10/ Enter (cleanup)

i guess that should work, but it's untested... and there might be simpler methods...

ueli

One way to do this with the existing syntax is to add a follow-on cue with a hang time of 0 that executes the macro. 

--- uelirigg beat me to it.  :)

Thank you very much for your help. Would be a good option to add for the future, to trigger a cue at start or end of the trigger cue

using Uli sntax and add [cue only] and that should keep information from tracking if that is an issue. 

You need the values in the point cues to be tracked so that they automatically update whenever you update the 'real' cue.

Creating these 'utility' point cues [Cue Only] (or asserting them) could break your show when the 'real' cue before is updated.
They need to be completely 'blank' with no moves in them.

Edit: Just realised what you meant.

These utility cues shouldn't be recorded [Cue only] because the value in the 'real' cue afterwards is already correctly tracked or otherwise.
You don't want to make any changes to the following cue, and [Cue Only] works by altering the 'next' cue to still contain the same values it had before the edit - by making some of them into moves whenever necessary.

You don't want to do that, you want these inserted cues to be completely empty and transparent.